Reply to Stricker and Johnson
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Reply to Johnson and Wright.
Johnson and Wright ~hereafter J&W! claim, in their brief communication entitled “Reply to Philipona and O’Regan” that there are various difficulties in the reasoning in Philipona and O’Regan’s ~2006! paper entitled “Color naming, unique hues and hue cancellation predicted from singularities in reflection properties,” which was published in this journal in 2006. These difficulties supposedly pre...
متن کاملPlace and process in conservation planning for climate change: a reply to Keppel and Wardell-Johnson.
buffering provided by this continuum is the capacity of the refugium [8]. Global climate projections are now unidirectional (e.g., Figure 2 in [5]). The separation of stepping-stone, holdout and microrefugia components (sensu [5]) of the refugium continuum is therefore rendered impotent for conservation planning under anthropogenic climate change. All three proposed components are refugia, as t...
متن کاملReply to: "Prognosis and management of Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis".
A retrospective analysis of 21 consecutive patients hospitalized with either Stevens-Johnson syndrome or toxic epidermal necrolysis was carried out to assess morbidity and mortality rates and to establish the value of a specific management practice. Fourteen children with Stevens-Johnson syndrome and seven with toxic epidermal necrolysis were cared for at the Children's Memorial Hospital, Chica...
متن کاملCan whole-drawer images measure up? A reply to Johnson et al. (2013)?
Johnson et al. (2013) found that morphometric measurements of dragonfly wings taken from actual specimens and measurements taken from whole-drawer images of those specimens were equally accurate. We do not believe that their conclusions are justified by their data and analysis. Our reasons are, first, that their study was constrained in ways that restrict the generalisability of their results, ...
متن کاملResponse to Johnson and Danhauer
We thank Johnson and Danhauer for pointing out our oversight of calling the ED-NST the CUNY-NST. The nonsense syllable test that we used in the Auriemmo et al (2009) study was indeed the Edgerton-Danhauer Nonsense Syllable Test (ED-NST), which we have referenced correctly throughout the manuscript. We also agree with Johnson and Danhauer on the requisite considerations in administering an open-...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Clinical Infectious Diseases
سال: 2010
ISSN: 1058-4838,1537-6591
DOI: 10.1086/653006